Tervetuloa kursseillemme

Autokoulu Helsinki | Lassen Autokoulu sijaitsee Kontulassa sekä Itä-keskuksessa

ICMJE - Recommendations - Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors

Quantum Computing is the design of hardware and software that replaces Boolean logic by quantum law at the algorithmic level. For certain computations such as optimization, sampling, search or quantum simulation this promises dramatic speedups.

Published research paper

We are particularly interested in applying quantum computing to artificial intelligence and machine learning. This is because many tasks in these areas rely on solving hard optimization problems or performing efficient sampling. Having a machine learning agent interact with its environment requires true unsupervised learning, skill acquisition, active learning, exploration and get a research paper published, all ingredients of human learning that are still not well understood or exploited through the supervised approaches that dominate deep learning today.

Our goal is to improve robotics via machine learning, and improve machine learning via robotics. We foster close collaborations between machine learning researchers and roboticists to enable learning at scale on real and simulated robotic systems. The Internet and the World Wide Web have brought many changes that provide huge benefits, in particular by giving people easy access to information that was previously unavailable, or simply hard to find.

Unfortunately, these changes have raised many new challenges published research paper the security of computer systems and the protection of information against unauthorized access and abusive usage.

Get a research paper published

We have people working on nearly every aspect of security, privacy, and anti-abuse including access control and information security, networking, operating systems, language design, cryptography, fraud detection and prevention, spam and abuse detection, denial of service, anonymity, privacy-preserving systems, disclosure controls, as well as user interfaces and other human-centered aspects of security and privacy.

Our security and privacy efforts cover a broad range of systems including mobile, cloud, distributed, sensors and embedded systems, and large-scale machine learning.

At Google, we pride ourselves on our ability to develop and launch new products and features at a very fast pace. This is made possible in part by our world-class engineers, but our approach to software development enables us to balance speed and quality, and is integral to our success.

Our obsession for speed and scale is evident in our developer infrastructure and tools. Our engineers leverage these tools and infrastructure to produce clean code and keep software development running at an ever-increasing scale.

In our publications, we share associated technical challenges and lessons learned along the way. Delivering Google's products to our users requires computer systems that have a scale previously unknown to the industry. Building on our hardware foundation, we develop technology across the entire systems published research paper, from operating system device drivers all the way up to multi-site software systems that run on hundreds of thousands of computers.

We design, build and operate warehouse-scale computer systems that are deployed across the globe. We build storage systems that scale to exabytes, approach the performance of RAM, and never lose a byte. We design algorithms that transform our understanding of published research paper is possible. Thanks to the distributed systems we provide our developers, they are some of the most productive in the industry.

And we write and publish research papers to share what we have learned, and because peer feedback and interaction helps us build better systems that benefit everybody. Our goal in Speech Technology Research is to make speaking to devices--those around you, those that you wear, and those that you carry with you--ubiquitous and seamless.

Our research focuses on what makes Google unique: computing scale and data. Using large scale computing resources pushes us to rethink the architecture and algorithms of speech recognition, and experiment with the kind of methods that have in the past been considered prohibitively expensive. We also look at parallelism and cluster computing in a new light to change the way experiments are run, algorithms are developed and research is conducted.

The field of speech recognition is data-hungry, and using more and more data to tackle a problem tends to help performance but poses new challenges: how do you deal with data overload? How do you leverage unsupervised and semi-supervised techniques at scale? Which class of algorithms merely compensate for lack of data and which scale well with the task at hand? Increasingly, we find that the answers to these questions are surprising, and steer the whole field into directions that would never have been considered, were it not for the availability how to write an academic report significantly higher orders of magnitude of data.

We are also in a unique position to deliver very user-centric research. Researchers are able to conduct live experiments to test and benchmark new algorithms directly in a realistic controlled environment. Whether these are algorithmic performance improvements or user experience and human-computer interaction studies, we focus on solving real problems and with real impact for users. We have a huge commitment to the diversity of our users, and have made it a priority to deliver the best performance to every language on the planet.

We currently have systems operating in more than 55 languages, and we continue to expand our reach to more users. The challenges of internationalizing at scale is immense and rewarding. Many speakers of the languages we reach have never had the experience of speaking to a computer before, and breaking this new ground brings up new research on how to better serve this wide variety of users. Combined with the unprecedented translation capabilities of Google Translate, we are now at the forefront of research in speech-to-speech translation and one step closer to a universal translator.

However, we generally recommend not asking for specific reviewers to be excluded. The editor may be more knowledgeable about the subject of your paper than you think. In addition, the editor might look into why you requested that certain individuals not be reviewers, and this could get a research paper published a higher level of scrutiny to your paper during the review process.

On the other hand, it is beneficial to include some suggested reviewers, especially individuals who are knowledgeable about your work but may not already be known to the editor. In addition to the manuscript and cover letter, many online submission systems require you to answer a series of additional questions. Answer them completely and accurately. These checklists give the editor information about your submission that will help guide them through the evaluation and review process. Your manuscript should be accompanied by a cover letter addressed to the editor that includes specific information required by the journal to which you are submitting.

You will often be asked to assert that the manuscript is original, is not being submitted elsewhere, and is being made available exclusively to that journal. The cover letter gives you an opportunity to tell the editor why get a research paper published should consider your manuscript.

All journals are looking for manuscripts that are impactful, so in a few sentences explain what is new and interesting in your work. This is not an abstract or introduction, but rather an opportunity to sell the editor on the importance of your results.

State how the manuscript fits into the scope of the journal, especially if that will not be immediately obvious to the editor. Each journal focuses on a specific readership, and while you might have a significant technical contribution, it will not have the appropriate impact if it is not within the scope of the journal.

After your get a research paper published is accepted into the online system, the editor will begin processing the manuscript. The editor conducts an initial analysis to determine whether your submission is research paper published for the journal and should be sent for peer review.

For example, a highly theoretical paper might not be the best fit for an applied journal, or the subject might not be appropriate or too highly specialized. The editor may try to determine if the research is sufficiently significant, unique, or novel.

During this initial review, the editor is likely not reading your entire manuscript, but rather focusing on the title, abstract, and possibly the conclusions.

This is one reason these sections of your manuscript are so important, and why you need to spend extra time preparing and reviewing them. The preliminary review also determines whether the paper adheres to the ethical standards of the journal.

The peer reviewers perform the detailed technical review. The editor will identify several experts in the field who will read your manuscript and offer their opinion of its technical quality.

They will assess whether the manuscript is sufficient for consideration, focusing on several aspects of the submission:. Editors are not perfect at selecting peer reviewers, but they generally have enough information about your submission to be able to identify individuals with sufficient expertise to critically evaluate your paper.

The editor typically invites three to five referees to evaluate your manuscript, with two reviews normally required for a decision. It is not uncommon for the editor to get a variety of opinions from the reviewers, so the decision is not always straightforward. As part of the growing trend toward openness in scientific research and publishing, a relatively new alternative is transparent peer review TPR.

TPR is a voluntary option that an author can select during the submission process. Reviewers can choose to remain anonymous or reveal their identities. Once the editor makes a decision on your manuscript, he or she will inform you of the next steps. Several outcomes are possible:. Let the comments sink in before deciding how you want to proceed. Getting upset at the reviewers will not benefit you as you work to address their concerns.

Remember that the reviewers are reacting to the information that you provided, and their comments may reflect a lack of clarity in what you wrote. The revision gives you the opportunity to sharpen the message. It is helpful to remind the editor of the requested revision and then provide a specific statement regarding the changes that you made.

If you decide that one or more of the comments cannot, or get a research paper published not, be addressed, explain your rationale. Be thorough with your revisions and in your response, since the editor wants to ensure that you took the comments seriously.

The goal of the review is to improve the quality of your manuscript and to make sure that it is technically accurate; your work through the revision process is critical to achieving that outcome. If your manuscript is rejected, you will also receive comments from the reviewers. Consider and address the comments in a revised manuscript and then submit that. Since the online manuscript submission system considers the rejected-and-revised paper to be a new submission, you may not be able to submit your responses to the comments in a separate document, but you can include that information within the cover letter for the revised paper.

After your manuscript is accepted, you will likely be asked to complete a copyright transfer agreement CTA to transfer the copyright of your paper to the publisher. Your manuscript will dissertation writing services usa will be published without a signed CTA, so complete all of the required documents quickly to ensure timely publication of your work.

Authors with funding from organizations that mandate open access publication will be automatically directed to a CC-BY license. If you are affiliated with certain institutions from Germany, Norway, Austria, Hungary, or the Netherlands, your open access publishing fees may be covered. You will receive a typeset version of your article page proofs to review and make sure there are no typographical errors or other minor typesetting issues that need to be corrected.

This is not an opportunity to make substantial changes. Standard practice is to publish your article electronically as soon as it is in the proper format, and then later place it into a hard-copy paper format or into an online volume and issue if the journal is an online-only publication.

Simulation softwares easies Please don't pick overly ambitious topics; instead identify a realistic size problem. Gather the Matlab files available in the Internet that is related to your topic and simulate it for the claimed results. Please don't expect the Mfiles readily available for a solution published in a paper.

But you can make it of your own by modifying and adding. Believe me, Matlab is a very easy tool! Once you are able to get the simulated outputs of your solution, you can carry on for making a paper out of it.

Essence of your work The essence of your work can be diagnosed by analyzing below listed points. We can increase the maturity of the paper by improving these. Significance: Why was this work done? Did you solve an important problem of current interest or is it an obscure or obsolete problem? Get a research paper published you need to develop new tools, either analytical or physical?

Completeness: Have you tested a wide range of scenarios, or is this just a simple proof-of-concept? Correct: Is your solution technically sound or are there errors? Anatomy of Paper Generally a paper has seven sections and a maximum of four pages.

They are 1. Abstract, 2. Introduction, 3. Existing techniques, 4. Your contribution, 5. Results and 6. The procedure As a part of your paper publication, you can start documenting the 'existing techniques' from the scrap journal you did during the studies. Important Journal Details. Peer-reviewed, Refereed Journals. Impact Factor. Important Dates regarding Publication Procedure. Types of Articles invited. Learn More for call for paper.Mangalam University doi: Karnataka, India doi: S Alathiyur, Tirur, Kerala doi: More Publication Fee Open access publishing is not without costs.

Submission open Vol. Issue 1 February-Issue Impact Factor: 6. Author Guidelines. Who research paper published decide?

And should the mugs be obliged to keep quiet? Seven academics have their say. Skip to main content. How to get your first research paper published. Unlike most industries, in academic publishing the two most important inputs are provided "virtually free of charge". Publishers argue that they add value to the publishing process through support to the peer review group, including stipends, as well as through typesetting, printing, and web publishing.

Investment analysts, however, have been skeptical of the value added by for-profit publishers, as exemplified by a Deutsche Bank analysis which stated that "we believe the publisher adds relatively little value to the publishing process A crisis in academic publishing is "widely perceived"; [19] the apparent crisis has to do with the combined pressure of budget cuts at universities and increased costs for journals the serials crisis.

The humanities have been particularly affected by the pressure on university publishers, which are less able to publish monographs when libraries can not afford to purchase them. In the Modern Language Association expressed hope that electronic publishing would solve the issue.

Several models are being investigated, such as open publication models or research paper published community-oriented features. In academic publishing, a paper is an academic work that research paper published usually published in an academic journal. It contains original research results or reviews existing results. Such a paper, also called an article, will only be considered valid if it undergoes a process of peer review by one or more referees who are academics in the same field who check that the content of the paper is suitable for publication in the journal.

A paper may undergo a series of reviews, revisions, and re-submissions before finally being accepted or rejected for publication. This process typically takes several months.

Planning to Write

Next, there is often a delay of many months or in some fields, over a year before an accepted manuscript appears. Due to this, many academics self-archive a ' pre-print ' copy of their paper for free download from their personal or institutional website. Some journals, particularly newer ones, are now published in electronic form only.

Paper journals are now generally made available in electronic form as well, both to individual subscribers, and to libraries. Almost always these electronic versions are available to subscribers immediately upon publication of the paper version, or even before; sometimes they are also made available to non-subscribers, either immediately by open access journals or after an embargo of anywhere from two to twenty-four months or more, in order to protect against loss of subscriptions.

Journals having this delayed availability get a research paper published sometimes called delayed open access journals. Ellison in reported that in economics the dramatic increase in opportunities to publish results online has led to a decline in the use of peer-reviewed articles.

An academic paper typically belongs to some particular category such as: [27]. Note: Law review is the generic term for a journal of legal scholarship in the United Statesoften operating by rules radically different from those for most other academic journals. Peer review is a central concept for published research paper academic publishing; other scholars in a field must find a work sufficiently high in quality for it to merit publication.

A secondary benefit of the process is an indirect guard against plagiarism since reviewers are usually familiar with the sources consulted by the author s. The origins of routine peer review for submissions dates to when the Royal Society of London took over official responsibility for Philosophical Transactions. However, there were some earlier examples. While journal editors largely agree the system is essential to quality control in terms of rejecting poor quality work, there have been examples of important results that are turned down by one journal before being taken to others.

Rena Steinzor wrote:. Perhaps the most widely recognized failing of peer review is its inability to ensure the identification of high-quality work.

For an article in a good journal, it research paper published be a four-digit amount. You can win prizes for more or less outstanding papers, which comes close to earning money compare top athletes who live from prize money instead of salary. Certainly Yes. There are two ways of earning money from publication: Indirect as seteropere explains by improving your visibility and getting higher chance of being recruited in higher quality institute with higher payment.

Espanta Espanta 3, 2 2 gold badges 18 my summer vacation essay silver badges 40 40 bronze badges. If you are looking only for money then doing research is one of the bad choices you have.

My field is Computer Science. I am a masters student. I am also a software Engineer. I thought doing masters would increase my value in the industry. While it's not expected of people that they sell papers, can they sell manuscripts if they are in dire need of money - with money back if it gets rejected? Learn why people trust wikiHow.

This article was co-authored by our trained team of editors and researchers who validated it for accuracy and comprehensiveness. Together, they cited information from 18 references. Learn more Explore this Article Sample Citations. Writing an In-Text Citation. Show 1 more Show less Tips and Warnings. Related Articles. Article Summary. Part 1 of Name the author and the publication date in-text before a quote. To simplify the in-text citation, place the last name of the author in the text to introduce the quote and then the publication date for the text in parentheses.

Reader Success Stories. Only doing the work and not sharing or not keeping it open for others is not encouraged in any research field. This article provides very useful resources for any newbie in the research field about how to get your work published to the world! Rated this article:.

DO David Okandeji Oct 23, I highly recommended it to all young researchers who are eager to publish their research works. MA Mohamed A. Sep 10, RJ Revati Joshi Feb 13, Shahzad Khan Jul 1, OW Oma Wright Apr 7, Useful tips under each picture make it easy. Thank you for a great start. A Anonymous May 11, EE Eddy Ehiji Jan 19, AR Asaidurai Rangasami Feb 3, CS Chiranjeevi Sagi Dec 2, SR Shakira Rehmana Oct 1, Yet to get hands on publishing I have a long way to go!

HK Hiren Kachchhi Aug 3, I found my answer by reading this article. AS Aakash Sen Jul 29, A Anonymous Feb 20, MT Mulugeta Tamene Jul 18, It probably resulted in a lot of deaths. A profile in a New York Times Magazine article noted:.

How to Publish Research Paper - IJSTR

Andrew Wakefield has become one of the most reviled doctors of his generation, blamed directly get a research paper published indirectly, depending on the accuser, for irresponsibly starting a panic with tragic repercussions: vaccination rates so low that childhood diseases once all but eradicated here-whooping cough and measles, among them-have re-emerged, endangering young lives. Journalist Brian Deer called for criminal charges against Wakefield. Handley of the autism and anti-vaccine advocacy group Generation Rescue noted, "To our community, Andrew Wakefield is Nelson Mandela and Jesus Christ rolled up into one.

A journal article described the vaccine-autism connection as "the most damaging medical hoax of the last years". Qualities of a good teacher essayWakefield was at the top of the list of the worst doctors of in Medscape 's list of "Physicians of the Year: Best and Worst". A writer from The New York Timeswho was covering a event in Tomball, Texas where Wakefield spoke, was threatened by its organizer, Michelle Guppy: "Be research paper published to him, or we will hurt you.

In Junea local court in RiminiItaly, ruled that the MMR vaccination had caused autism in a month-old boy. The court relied heavily on Wakefield's discredited Lancet paper and largely ignored the scientific evidence presented to it. The decision was appealed. In FebruaryWakefield denied that he bore any responsibility for the measles epidemic that started at Disneyland.

He also reaffirmed his discredited belief that "MMR contributes to the current autism epidemic". Paul Offit did not agree, saying that the outbreak was "directly related to Dr. Wakefield's theory". Filmmaker Miranda Bailey followed Wakefield and his wife Carmel and their children for five years filming a documentary about Wakefield as a person, The Pathological Optimist. According to Robert Ladendorf writing for Skeptical Inquirer magazine, Bailey attempted to remain neutral and add a "human touch", which Ladendorf says was successful.

Wakefield is shown "as a soft-spoken but beleaguered family man trying to resurrect his reputation and raising money for his legal fund. Wakefield was scheduled to testify before the Oregon Senate Health Care Committee on 9 Marchin opposition to Senate Bill published research paper, [] "a bill that would eliminate nonmedical exemptions from Oregon's school immunization law". The Oregon Chiropractic Association had invited him.

The chairwoman of the committee then canceled the meeting "after it became clear that" Wakefield planned to testify. She denied that her decision had anything to do with Wakefield's plans. On 24 AprilWakefield received two standing ovations from the students at Life Chiropractic College West when he told them to oppose Senate Bill SB, a bill that proposes elimination of non-medical vaccine exemptions.

But as a documentary it misrepresents what science knows about autism, undermines public confidence in the safety and efficacy of vaccines, and attacks the integrity of legitimate scientists and public-health officials". From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Discredited former British doctor. Eton, BerkshireEngland. Main article: Lancet MMR autism fraud. See also: Swansea measles epidemic and Measles outbreaks in the 21st century.

Main article: Vaxxed. Wakefield, Andrew J 24 May Skyhorse Publishing. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. The Lancet.

May Retrieved 9 January The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 19 February November The Sunday Times. Retrieved 16 February